cosmopolitanspook:

im-alex-s:

saminat:

sparky-and-sparkle:

queenkoi:

I’m about to ufcking piss

Twitter is fucking stupid.

My brother claimed he heard about this and he put his phone in the microwave. I thought he was joking but as he started to push buttons I realized the moron was serious. Quickly ran over and opened it, thank goodness!

delicious trolling at its finest

just two seconds of googling lol I saw the post on tumblr, I smelled bullshit and it took two seconds to learn it was a hoax

(Source: iftadwascool)

38,742 notes

arhenadoeslife:

fiercefatfeminist:

👏👏👏👏👏👏👏👏👏👏👏👏👏👏👏👏👏👏👏👏👏👏👏👏👏

Let me introduce you to the University of Toronto protest that happened in 2012.  Warren Farrell was holding a lecture discussing men’s rights, men’s issues and problems that they face in society and this is what happened.
Feminist activists embodied the exact opposite of peaceful protest and had to be forced back by a multitude of police because they were physically barring the entrance to the campus building, keeping many from entering to listen to the lecture.
Later on the fire alarm was pulled without cause, an act which is punishable by law.  Curiously though, no charges were ever filed and no investigation was put toward finding out who pulled the alarm to disrupt this lecture.  
This is what happens when people who are concerned about male DV victims talk.  This is what happens when men try to find their own space to work out how to handle the problems they face in society.  Left and right, you have these self-righteous people who are framing the narrative to make it look as though they’re preemptively silencing hate speech, rather than silencing a man’s freedom of speech.
If you want people to stop bringing up male victims in the same conversation talking about female victims, stop silencing the people who are trying to talk about male victims on their own time.  Thank you.

arhenadoeslife:

fiercefatfeminist:

👏👏👏👏👏👏👏👏👏👏👏👏👏👏👏👏👏👏👏👏👏👏👏👏👏

Let me introduce you to the University of Toronto protest that happened in 2012.  Warren Farrell was holding a lecture discussing men’s rights, men’s issues and problems that they face in society and this is what happened.

Feminist activists embodied the exact opposite of peaceful protest and had to be forced back by a multitude of police because they were physically barring the entrance to the campus building, keeping many from entering to listen to the lecture.

Later on the fire alarm was pulled without cause, an act which is punishable by law.  Curiously though, no charges were ever filed and no investigation was put toward finding out who pulled the alarm to disrupt this lecture.  

This is what happens when people who are concerned about male DV victims talk.  This is what happens when men try to find their own space to work out how to handle the problems they face in society.  Left and right, you have these self-righteous people who are framing the narrative to make it look as though they’re preemptively silencing hate speech, rather than silencing a man’s freedom of speech.

If you want people to stop bringing up male victims in the same conversation talking about female victims, stop silencing the people who are trying to talk about male victims on their own time.  Thank you.

5,378 notes

poppypicklesticks:

socialjusticeprincesses:

sjwstupidity:

truestfeminist:

aboutwhitewomen:

1. Feminists
2. Rapists

So basically feminists and anti-feminists

wrong, there are anti-feminist women and we all know women cannot rape.

these people are inconsistant it’s laughable.

~ Mulan

Its down to cultural munchousen by proxy. Feminists want more women raped, so they can continue to receive praise and have people pay attention to them. They are threatened by the idea of less women being raped, because that means less of them getting interviewed, less students paying for their Wimmin’s Studies courses, and generally being less relevant. It’s in their best interests to not lower rape rates, or at least keep people gripped by moral panics.

717 notes

Anonymous said: Sorry to sound ignorant, but why do MRAs and Feminists act like arch enemies when they're both working towards the same goal? I mean, MRAs want to deal with issues that men face, while feminists want to deal with women's issues. I do agree the women definitely face more issues than men and MRAs do tend to be very whiny sometimes. Even so, I don't understand why so many Feminists and MRAs hate each other. You both want equality, so why not work together?

poppypicklesticks:

endgaem:

thesilverdragonfly:

claudiaboleyn:

If you took a look at MRAs online then you’d see why a movement for gender equality/liberation from the Patriarchy/general goodness and the progression of humanity, wouldn’t want a thing to do with them. 

Dear anon,

No. Just no.

The MRA do not want equal rights and there is a HUGE difference between feminism and the MRA. Feminists want true gender equality. They want women to have the same rights as men. They want everybody to be free of the constrictive gender roles caused by the patriarchy.

The MRA are a bunch of misogynists who are infuriated by the notion of women’s rights. The idea of them not being able to oppress women angers them. If you don’t believe me then check out some of their stuff. They encourage forms of violence against women and vilify feminists for no good reason.

The MRA don’t even care about men’s rights. When they say ‘men’s rights’ they really mean straight, white, middle-class men’s rights. If you support equality do not be an MRA.

Well colour me intrigued. Disappointed, but intrigued. 

Hasty Generalization fallacy? Check.

Ad hominem fallacy? Check.

False dichotomy fallacy? Check.

Now, I’m not even an MRA, but based on what I’ve read, more often than not it’s been feminists derailing MRA discussions. Case in point:

Exhibit A.

Exhibit B. -(notably at 2:08)

Why is that? From each video it appears that the protestors don’t even know what the conferences will be discussing, yet because it is from a Men’s Rights group they automatically assume it is hate speech? What are these feminists afraid of? 

For a group that claims to advocate for men’s rights you seem to be doing a damned good job of shutting up any platform for reasonable discussion, even when it’s a woman leading the discussion. Weird how people can say one thing and do something else entirely, innit?

Oh god.

The hypocrisy.

Feminists on here are outraged by the thought of them not being the only victims.  That women have the power to be the aggressor or the bigot.  Of a heartbeat or a single neurone being spent on anything but them.

The idea of more awareness being given to things like eating disorders, rape, domestic violence or suicide and depression in men bothers them: those are female problems dammit!  How dare you ever suggest that a woman is ever the victim?

Not to mention their treatment of minority men.  The idea of not being able to have gay men under their thumb as political fashion accessories, pets and mouthpieces angers them: Jezebel constantly declares that safe spaces for gay men should not only cater for the amusement and pleasure of straight women, they MUST prioritise straight women and treat them like queens: straight women not being showered in free drinks, compliments on how fierce their dresses and being allowed to cut to the front of lines is “misogyny”.   Catfishing gay men on grindr for a feminist art show!  An amazing counterattack on misogyny and sexism and sexual harassment!

MRAs vilify feminists for no reason!  Oh please, you think womenagainstfeminism are the whores of Babylon.  Look at your reaction to an MRA meeting.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=iARHCxAMAO0

"FACCCKING SCAAAAMMMMMM"

The MRA don’t even care about men’s rights. When they say ‘men’s rights’ they really mean straight, white, middle-class men’s rights. If you support equality do not be an MRA.”

Oh really?  

Is that why the big feminist issues on this site aren’t things like FGM or fistulas or little girls being raped by HIV positive men or human trafficking: no it’s always shit like Ban Bossy, Disney Princesses, videogames, “thin privilege” and how you are oppressed because you can’t wear booty shorts to school.

Piss off, Wendy White Guilt.

 

210 notes

thedorkiestviking said: did you know that when erin pizzey said that men suffer from domestic abuse & that women weren't the sole victims of abuse, her entire family was threatened by feminists , they shot her dog & led the police to put her mail through a bomb squad before driving her out of Britain, & that shit like that continues to this day? are you aware that the leaders of feminism that does more than everyone else in the movement & are highly respected by feminists, are actually sexist?

poppypicklesticks:

onemv:

stfumras:

I know that Erin Pizzey is an MRA who works with AVFM and has said that women are responsible for their abuse.  I also know that I have yet to come across any proof that Pizzey received threats from feminists.  I also know that I and mod Elena have been heavily involved in the feminist movement for over 15 years each and have never come across a feminist who has made a threat against another person who wasn’t an abuser/rapist.  I also know that MRAs and “egalitarians” have such unconvincing and non-factual based arguments and ideals that they need to portray feminists as violent screaming harpies in order to discredit the movement.  I also know that the femnist movement has done more for male victims of violence than the Men’s rights misogynists could ever think of doing.  No movement is without fault, there may be some bad eggs, but that doesn’t mean you kill the chicken. 

She didn’t say women were responsible for their own abuse, she said some women seek out violent relationships. It’s documented that Erin Pizzey received threats and that her mail was intercepted and searched by bomb squads. It’s also on record that her dog was shot, and that she fled the country in fear. However to be fair blaming it on militant feminists(the term she uses) Is conjecture, but I tend to agree. Since I cannot see any other group that would have wanted to do this when she started advocating for shelters for men and saying that women were equally capable of being abusive.

I can’t speak on your experience with feminists, only my own. (note: I am not interested in having her attacked or even approached about that incident, as I’ve said before people can have whatever opinion they like, even shitty ones)I’ve been on the receiving end of some real life abuse from feminists. I’ve been flatly told I should not have stopped my wife from trying to kill me, as I was being controlling and sexually abusive for well, details here.

But even then I’m not against the stated ideals and goals of feminists, I fully support the dictionary definition. But I probably don’t count because I’m not an MRA. That’s fine.

But considering that without a single cent of government money, money that get’s funneled into feminist groups by the millions annually, the MRM has opened a shelter for men and an abuse hotline… I’d say they’ve done far more than an entire legion of feminists talking about how much they care about male victims. Feel free to show me feminists doing anything remotely as helpful. Don’t forget they were funded 100% by MRAs.

Funny when someone criticises Anita Sarkeesian or Zoe Quinn, the entire internet explodes in outrage.

"This is what it’s like to be a woman on the internet!!!!!" "Criticism is harassment!" "Misogyny is so deeply entrenched in our culture!  This is why we need femimsm!!!"

Yet when feminists not only threaten and harass Erin Pizzey but also her FAMILY with death threats and abuse? Not a fucking word.  Feminists constantly squawk about Anita having to move house, yet  when feminists murder Pizzey’s dog and leave its corpse on her doorstop as a “warning”, to the point that she actually leaves the country…

Nope feminists do not give a shit. No attempt to reign in their own movement. 

Hypocrisy at its finest

81 notes

poppypicklesticks:

this-is-fat-bullshit:

durkin62:

thespos:

durkin62:

thespos:

durkin62:

thespos:

durkin62:

thespos:

durkin62:

thetpr:

dawntheswan:

thuginsince95:

She said it!!!!

🙌 PREACH!

Ope! She said it!

Only 1.4% of people owned slaves here, and about 2000 of those slave owners were black. So yeah, that doesn’t really hold any fucking water. 

Ok firstly that still doesn’t make an argument. 1.4% owned slaves is incorrect and please leave wherever you got that source from. And nearly all African Americans in the u.s were slaves which was about 2,400,000 in the lower south alone, also including Mexicans and Hispanics. I don’t believe black people had human rights therefore they weren’t allowed to own property?? Meaning blacks owning slaves is out of the question. Also how can you even compare a figure of 2000 black slave owners to a figure of 300000 white slave owners. False equivalency?

http://americancivilwar.com/authors/black_slaveowners.htm
Slaves didn’t have human rights, free black people did. And I guess it is a bit of a false equivalency, considering that in the south, about 5% of white people owned slaves. Compared to About 25% of the free black people there who owned slaves. 
Hey, ask me who’s responsible for making slavery legal in the united states. Do it. It’ll be hilarious. 

Yes you are getting it! Even if there were about to 2000 black slave owners, they would be minor in comparison to 300,000 white slave owners.

Which itself is minor considering its 1.4% of the population. Which is even less than 1% once you factor in all the people who came here after slavery. But somehow all fucking white people benefit from something that less than 1% of people did, and even though black people did it too, no black people benefit from it. Its ok kid, consistency is hard, I get it. 
Sure you don’t wanna know who made slavery legal? Come on, be a sport. 

Lol no you almost had it. It’s false equivalency because just about all black people were owned as slaves when little to non white people were. When you factor in all the labor and building of America that we did the benefit equals the rich white slave owners descendants being rich and the black slave descendents getting nothing. And thanks for explaining to yourself how blacks owning blacks couldn’t benefit eithier, doesn’t quite work the same way? And no need I already know lol

Right, the slave owners benefit. Not white people in general. That includes the black slave owners.Dipshit. 
Lol, so then you know you’re blaming white people for something caused by black people then right? How much more of a hypocrite can you fucking get? 

OMG are you stupid?!? I’m explaining this one last time because you don’t get it. BLACK SLAVE OWNER no benefit. WHITE SLAVE OWNER AND SLAVE OWNER DESCENDENT many benefit. And wtf are you talking about? Hypocritical?? Do you even know how slavery started?

Are you fucking retarded? Let me explain this too you, owning slaves benefits the person no matter what race they are you ignorant fuck bucket. 
Yeah, it got started by Africans kidnapping other Africans to sell to Islamic people as slaves, as well as slaves for themselves. They then later started trading their fellow Africans to Europeans and Americans. Which later abolished the trade, but continued on with the slave trade to Arab nations as well as in Africa itself. But its all de evilz white menz fault. 

People have enslaved each other all through out history it wasnt like a new thing

In fact, slaves still exist: making our clothing and picking our chocolate.
Nope, the people who claim to care about slavery are too busy guzzling down chocolate from the Ivory Coast to care. 

poppypicklesticks:

this-is-fat-bullshit:

durkin62:

thespos:

durkin62:

thespos:

durkin62:

thespos:

durkin62:

thespos:

durkin62:

thetpr:

dawntheswan:

thuginsince95:

She said it!!!!

🙌 PREACH!

Ope! She said it!

Only 1.4% of people owned slaves here, and about 2000 of those slave owners were black. So yeah, that doesn’t really hold any fucking water. 

Ok firstly that still doesn’t make an argument. 1.4% owned slaves is incorrect and please leave wherever you got that source from. And nearly all African Americans in the u.s were slaves which was about 2,400,000 in the lower south alone, also including Mexicans and Hispanics. I don’t believe black people had human rights therefore they weren’t allowed to own property?? Meaning blacks owning slaves is out of the question. Also how can you even compare a figure of 2000 black slave owners to a figure of 300000 white slave owners. False equivalency?

http://americancivilwar.com/authors/black_slaveowners.htm

Slaves didn’t have human rights, free black people did. And I guess it is a bit of a false equivalency, considering that in the south, about 5% of white people owned slaves. Compared to About 25% of the free black people there who owned slaves. 

Hey, ask me who’s responsible for making slavery legal in the united states. Do it. It’ll be hilarious. 

Yes you are getting it! Even if there were about to 2000 black slave owners, they would be minor in comparison to 300,000 white slave owners.

Which itself is minor considering its 1.4% of the population. Which is even less than 1% once you factor in all the people who came here after slavery. But somehow all fucking white people benefit from something that less than 1% of people did, and even though black people did it too, no black people benefit from it. Its ok kid, consistency is hard, I get it. 

Sure you don’t wanna know who made slavery legal? Come on, be a sport. 

Lol no you almost had it. It’s false equivalency because just about all black people were owned as slaves when little to non white people were. When you factor in all the labor and building of America that we did the benefit equals the rich white slave owners descendants being rich and the black slave descendents getting nothing. And thanks for explaining to yourself how blacks owning blacks couldn’t benefit eithier, doesn’t quite work the same way? And no need I already know lol

Right, the slave owners benefit. Not white people in general. That includes the black slave owners.Dipshit. 

Lol, so then you know you’re blaming white people for something caused by black people then right? How much more of a hypocrite can you fucking get? 

OMG are you stupid?!? I’m explaining this one last time because you don’t get it. BLACK SLAVE OWNER no benefit. WHITE SLAVE OWNER AND SLAVE OWNER DESCENDENT many benefit. And wtf are you talking about? Hypocritical?? Do you even know how slavery started?

Are you fucking retarded? Let me explain this too you, owning slaves benefits the person no matter what race they are you ignorant fuck bucket. 

Yeah, it got started by Africans kidnapping other Africans to sell to Islamic people as slaves, as well as slaves for themselves. They then later started trading their fellow Africans to Europeans and Americans. Which later abolished the trade, but continued on with the slave trade to Arab nations as well as in Africa itself. But its all de evilz white menz fault. 

People have enslaved each other all through out history it wasnt like a new thing

In fact, slaves still exist: making our clothing and picking our chocolate.

Nope, the people who claim to care about slavery are too busy guzzling down chocolate from the Ivory Coast to care. 

30,919 notes

poppypicklesticks:

alternaterealitygame:

And don’t forget that Zoe Quinn used the word faggot!

Feminist life hacks:Become a feminist and never ever have to accept responsibility for your actions again no matter how illegal or unethical, and gain an army of enablers who will harass and dox anyone who disagrees with you or you simply dislike 

1,773 notes

christyna-c:

banging-dickens:

mrbubblebug:

danstoncoeur:

princessjohnegbert:




Fun Historical Fact: There used to be more gay and lesbian content in early silent films until religious groups protested resulting in “decency standards.”



THE WAY THE ONE GIRL LOOKS DOWN ALL SHY AND THE OTHER CUPS HER FACE SO SWEETLY TO COMFORT HER- AHHHH

THIS IS MY FAVORITE GIF OF ALL TIME. I ALWAYS GET HAPPY WHEN I SEE IT ON MY DASH GAAAAH.

Fun Historical Fact: This is a scene from the movie, Orphans of the Storm. A movie about two sisters who are not romantically involved and are instead caught up in the turmoil of the French Revolution, separated, and eventually reunited.
Get your facts straight. Do you honestly think the 20’s would have been accepting of the gay community? Oh yeah, women can’t vote, work or think for themselves, and people of color are lower than dirt. But lesbians? Yeah, okay we’re cool with that.
Fuck off. Stop spreading misinformation.

This has been another episode of “Shit Tumblr Makes Up.” Tune in next time for “Cis Privilege in the Holocaust.”


Shit tumblr  makes up

christyna-c:

banging-dickens:

mrbubblebug:

danstoncoeur:

princessjohnegbert:

Fun Historical Fact: There used to be more gay and lesbian content in early silent films until religious groups protested resulting in “decency standards.”

THE WAY THE ONE GIRL LOOKS DOWN ALL SHY AND THE OTHER CUPS HER FACE SO SWEETLY TO COMFORT HER- AHHHH

THIS IS MY FAVORITE GIF OF ALL TIME. I ALWAYS GET HAPPY WHEN I SEE IT ON MY DASH GAAAAH.

Fun Historical Fact: This is a scene from the movie, Orphans of the Storm. A movie about two sisters who are not romantically involved and are instead caught up in the turmoil of the French Revolution, separated, and eventually reunited.

Get your facts straight. Do you honestly think the 20’s would have been accepting of the gay community? Oh yeah, women can’t vote, work or think for themselves, and people of color are lower than dirt. But lesbians? Yeah, okay we’re cool with that.

Fuck off. Stop spreading misinformation.

This has been another episode of “Shit Tumblr Makes Up.” Tune in next time for “Cis Privilege in the Holocaust.”

Shit tumblr makes up

(Source: string-a-plume)

230,579 notes

cosmopolitanspook:

im-alex-s:

saminat:

sparky-and-sparkle:

queenkoi:

I’m about to ufcking piss

Twitter is fucking stupid.

My brother claimed he heard about this and he put his phone in the microwave. I thought he was joking but as he started to push buttons I realized the moron was serious. Quickly ran over and opened it, thank goodness!

delicious trolling at its finest

just two seconds of googling lol I saw the post on tumblr, I smelled bullshit and it took two seconds to learn it was a hoax

(Source: iftadwascool)

38,742 notes

poppypicklesticks:

aboutwhitewomen:

I guess feminism is the radical notion that women are people, but men are inanimate objects/animals.

Oh, and in case any of you need to have it explained why comparing men to M&Ms or puppies is not only dehumanizing, but also also completely unhelpful, here’s the thing. And that thing is called individuality. It means that individual humans are distinct and completely separate from one another, with their own consciousness, experiences, identity, reputation, and discernible personal characteristics. This is unlike M&Ms, which are anonymous, indistinguishable, and have absolutely no cognitive capacity whatsoever. And unlike dogs and other animals that can be conditioned for desired behavior, people are afforded the right to live within a system of rules & laws that inform their actions, with specific individual punishments reserved for specific transgressions.

Again, whenever I post examples of TERFs, homophobia from feminists, sex-negative feminists, girlfags, political lesbians, feminists telling male rape victims to go kill themselves, feminists accusing female rape victims of lying about being raped if they don’t buy into rape culture because rape victims would always buy into hysteria, white feminists screeching at indian girls for saying that its okay to wear bindis, feminists responding to homophobia against gay men or transphobia against trans men with male tears, feminists fly into a rage and screech at me for daring to call out the toxic elements of their movement and Not All Feminists Are Like That, even when they themselves are Just Like That.

Suddenly the m and ms and cookies logic goes flying out the window when you use the same logic on them.

706 notes

demonic-lionfish:

fixyourwritinghabits:

tyvianred:

tyvianred:

degeneratelowlife:


Heads up…


WARNING:
THIS INFOGRAPHIC WILL GET YOU KILLED IF YOU THINK THAT’S ALL YOU NEED TO KNOW
HAVE SOME PICTURES:
THIS IS AN EDIBLE BOLETE: (THE FIRST ONE)

It is a king bolete one of the TASTIEST EVER it’s even sold in STORES
this is a DEATHLY POISONOUS BOLETE: 

it’s called SATAN’S BOLETE oh look how it’s shaped like the first one oooooh
OH AND THIS IS CALLED A DEATH CAP:

THE SECOND ONE IS PRETTY MUCH RIGHT, FLY AGARICS WILL DEFINITELY KILL YOU
BUT SO WILL MOST GILLED MUSHROOMS
AND IF YOU’RE REALLY SO FUCKING DESPERATE THAT YOU WILL WANDER THROUGH THE WOODS LOOKING TO GET HIGH ON SOME SHROOMS, HERE ARE SOME OTHER SPINDLY MUSHROOMS THAT WILL ALSO KILL YOU

THIS IS AN INKY CAP, IF YOU EAT IT WITH EVEN A BIT OF ALCOHOL IN YOU, YOU WILL DIE

THIS IS AMANITA BISPOREGERA, IF YOU EAT IT, YOU WILL DIE

THIS IS AMANITA VIROSA, ALSO CALLED THE DESTROYING ANGEL, AND FOR A MOTHERFUCKING REASON: IF YOU EAT IT, YOU DIE
HERE ARE SOME OTHER EXAMPLES, ASSHOLES
THIS IS EDIBLE:

THIS WILL KILL YOU

THE POINT I’M TRYING TO MAKE HERE IS DON’T GO BY A FUCKING INFOGRAPHIC YOU FOUND ON THE INTERNET IF YOU WANT TO GET HIGH
JUST SPEND THE MONEY ON SOME FUCKING MUSHROOMS*
*IF YOU ARE STUPID ENOUGH TO GO LOOKING FOR PSILOCYBINS, KEEP IN MIND THEY ONLY GROW ON OR IN DUNG/SHIT/FECES/EXCREMENT AND DON’T THINK THAT IF IT’S GROWING A FOOT AWAY IT’S THE SAME THING, IT’S NOT
I WOULD NOT SHIT YOU ON THIS TUMBLR
I WOULD NOT

here is my infamous mushroom post. god. i’m so glad the original post wasn’t mine, the notes would’ve driven me insane

seriously guys don’t die

Fly agaric won’t kill you if you don’t eat a lot, I’ve known folks who have eaten fly agaric and it has been an ethnobotanical with high human consumption for like
Ever

demonic-lionfish:

fixyourwritinghabits:

tyvianred:

tyvianred:

degeneratelowlife:

Heads up…

WARNING:

THIS INFOGRAPHIC WILL GET YOU KILLED IF YOU THINK THAT’S ALL YOU NEED TO KNOW

HAVE SOME PICTURES:

THIS IS AN EDIBLE BOLETE: (THE FIRST ONE)

image

It is a king bolete one of the TASTIEST EVER it’s even sold in STORES

this is a DEATHLY POISONOUS BOLETE: 

image

it’s called SATAN’S BOLETE oh look how it’s shaped like the first one oooooh

OH AND THIS IS CALLED A DEATH CAP:

image

THE SECOND ONE IS PRETTY MUCH RIGHT, FLY AGARICS WILL DEFINITELY KILL YOU

BUT SO WILL MOST GILLED MUSHROOMS

AND IF YOU’RE REALLY SO FUCKING DESPERATE THAT YOU WILL WANDER THROUGH THE WOODS LOOKING TO GET HIGH ON SOME SHROOMS, HERE ARE SOME OTHER SPINDLY MUSHROOMS THAT WILL ALSO KILL YOU

image

THIS IS AN INKY CAP, IF YOU EAT IT WITH EVEN A BIT OF ALCOHOL IN YOU, YOU WILL DIE

image

THIS IS AMANITA BISPOREGERA, IF YOU EAT IT, YOU WILL DIE

image

THIS IS AMANITA VIROSA, ALSO CALLED THE DESTROYING ANGEL, AND FOR A MOTHERFUCKING REASON: IF YOU EAT IT, YOU DIE

HERE ARE SOME OTHER EXAMPLES, ASSHOLES

THIS IS EDIBLE:

File:Chanterelle.jpg

THIS WILL KILL YOU

File:Mallorca Mushroom.jpg

THE POINT I’M TRYING TO MAKE HERE IS DON’T GO BY A FUCKING INFOGRAPHIC YOU FOUND ON THE INTERNET IF YOU WANT TO GET HIGH

JUST SPEND THE MONEY ON SOME FUCKING MUSHROOMS*

*IF YOU ARE STUPID ENOUGH TO GO LOOKING FOR PSILOCYBINS, KEEP IN MIND THEY ONLY GROW ON OR IN DUNG/SHIT/FECES/EXCREMENT AND DON’T THINK THAT IF IT’S GROWING A FOOT AWAY IT’S THE SAME THING, IT’S NOT


I WOULD NOT SHIT YOU ON THIS TUMBLR

I WOULD NOT

here is my infamous mushroom post. god. i’m so glad the original post wasn’t mine, the notes would’ve driven me insane

seriously guys don’t die

Fly agaric won’t kill you if you don’t eat a lot, I’ve known folks who have eaten fly agaric and it has been an ethnobotanical with high human consumption for like

Ever

61,426 notes

prbuick11:

vagueversusvogue:

barbie-teacatch:

al-grave:

"What do you play? The Clarinet, you? I play the fucking HAMMER"

I MEAN THE OTHER PLAYER’S FACES THO

the dude in the back knew it was coming, the other dude forgot

DAS MAHLER BOX

prbuick11:

vagueversusvogue:

barbie-teacatch:

al-grave:

"What do you play? The Clarinet, you? I play the fucking HAMMER"

I MEAN THE OTHER PLAYER’S FACES THO

the dude in the back knew it was coming, the other dude forgot

DAS MAHLER BOX

12,582 notes